In India news in a written change had always been considered the truth and has been more powerful than the spoken word. It has been considered as the fourth pillar of democracy. But such lay is not anymore. Do the media act as the fourth pillar? Do they answer the needs of the country? Are they accountable to the public or to themselves? The say remains negative. The concept of journalism came very effective in the 19
century at the same time leading to a war between the news papers. In order to change magnitude the circulation it stooped drink to the least extent possible. When someone accuses a newspaper of “color journalism” what they mean is that it presents the news in a biased manner. It distorts the facts and sensationalizes the news in request to get the public to buy the paper. It attempts to increase its circulation not by providing inaccurate news but by appealing to the public’s curiosity. The call “yellow journalism” is no longer restricted to newspapers alone it includes all other forms of media — television and communicate. This concept of sensitizing the public can be termed as “yellow journalism” which had its inception in USA.
Yellow journalism leads to trial by media and thy interfering in the administration of justice. In USA the remove speech has a protection of the constitution through First Amendment and in India this has been recognized as a fundamental alter under bind 19 (1) (a) of the Indian Constitution with some reasonable restrictions. It also simultaneously recognizes the right to privacy unless and until it has been taken away by the law itself. It is a western concept imbibed by the Indian media. This paper deals with the concept of yellow journalism and discusses its inception the ethical and legal and public policy norms in USA through the cases as examples. It also compares the position with India and gives a evaluate as to how this kind of ruthless art of news reporting can be stopped.
Flattered by Hearst’s efforts. Outcault defected to the Journal. Pulitzer refusing to give up his trademark draw hired another cartoonist to imitate the character resulting in “a time when there were two color Kids.” This widely-publicized resent led to the denominate “Yellow Journalism,” which in an effort to sell newspapers the Journal and the World embraced with enthusiasm
Both Pulitzer and Hearst sent correspondents photographers and artists among them the noted artist Frederick Remington–to Cuba in request to understand the situation. Upon arrival in Cuba. Remington wrote to his boss. Hearst stating that there was no war and requesting recall. Hearst denied the communicate stating. “Please remain. You furnish the pictures. I’ll furnish the war”. Hearst stood by his statement and was soon joined by other newspapers politicians and citizens. The rallying cry. “Remember the Maine!” echoed throughout the country. Pulitzer and Hearst had reached their goals: “higher circulation increased profits and war
The Shankaracharya was arrested at Mehboobnagar in Andhra Pradesh where he was camping at a textile move premises in 2004. Once after his arrest two leading newspapers of Andhra Pradesh published a series of articles that related the acharya’s name to the death of two young girls in the mill premises before six years back. The media reports were to this effect: “No action was taken by the police. Relatives of the management were involved. Also at the same measure. Jayendra Saraswathi came to the move and performed pujas and yagnas. There were rumours that the girls were killed as sacrifice”
And indeed a writ was filed before the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The High Court open the touch clippings of the ’secular’ media as the material basis for the writ plea. Justice Narasimha Reddy before whom the bespeak came up asked the discuss for the petitioner what was the basis for referring to Jayendra Saraswathi in the writ bespeak. The discuss apologised and agreed to delete a part of the writ plea. This forced the petitioner’s discuss to further apologise and also ask for the court’s permission to go the petition. The act did accept him to withdraw the bespeak but not before declaring what is ‘dharma’. But neither the withdrawal of the writ petition nor how Justice Narasimha Reddy gently and with great dignity reprimanded the media and wisely counselled them as to their dharma open displace in create. Justice Reddy observed that the “
This complaint dated 17.10.2002 has been filed by Shri Radhakrishna of Bangalore against Kannada fortnightly “Abhimanyu” for publishing an allegedly false baseless concocted malicious and defamatory news-item under the furnish “Kharge’s son-in-law in the books of Murgi Khaleel” along with sub-headings “cease of the shamelessness”. “Why the friendship of Khaleel?” and “approve blast of Kharge” in the issue dated 24.10.2002. The impugned news item stated that Kharge knows neither literature nor culture. The complainant while denying the allegations submitted that the impugned news item was published without proper pre-verification with the sole intention to act sensationalism in public object. The respondent submitted that the news item in question was published after proper investigation and each one of the sentence in the bind is written on the reaction given by the people of Gulbarga. It is the ethics of the journalism that truth must prevail added the respondent. He advance submitted that they published true facts and followed the ethics of the journalism. The respondent stated they have no personal animosity vengeance or grievances against the complainant. Whatever they had published was in the large interest of the general public and of Gulbarga in particular. On consideration of the records and oral submissions put forth before the committee by the parties it noted that the complainant had been charged with display of extra-constitutional authority and harassment of public. The language employed in the report was highly abusive. The Press Council on consideration of the records of the case and the report of the Inquiry Committee accepted the reasons findings and the recommendations of the Committee and decided accordingly. Thus the media had played a role in such way it assassinated the engrave of the person involved in the case.
At this juncture the media started their investigation and came up with several versions which made her to turn hostile. She was also been condemned for contempt of court by the Apex act of this country for interfering in the administration of justice. Even after four years of the incident took place comfort the verdict has not been rendered. This frustrates the entire intend of the justice being done to the party. The media should forbear themselves from getting into investigations and leading to a trial by them. This ordain not inculcate a pre conceived notions on the persons who are administering justice. This choose of a disadvantage will ultimately lead no where.
The same is the inspect with Jessica Lal and Priyadarshini Mattoo. On one hand. Jessica lal a copy who was shot dead by Manu sharma and Priyadarshini a law student from Delhi University was raped and murdered by Santosh Singh. Though the circumstances of their murder were different yet it leads to the same destiny. The prime accused of these two cases have been.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://www.lawyerspeaks.com/?p=36
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
