single north carolina

Last night I went to the Gala Show for the event in San Francisco - and it was absolutely fabulous! First off the venue was gorgeous. It was my first time in the. Not because I am not cultured but because I had no reason to go there. I must say that it is quite a stunning building. I would suggest that every Bay Area citizen go to this place at least once: The event honored Alice Waters and the for their work in creating for the Berkeley public schools. It will also give funding to three Bay Area hospitals to fight childhood obesity. It’s a really good cause - and I could relate but that’s a story I’ll save for later. The evening also featured a performance by the North Carolina-based jump roping wunderkinds of The Bouncing Bulldogs: I got tired by just watching them. These kids had energy that was off the charts! At one point I wondered if they were uber-agile humanoids pumped full of Red Bull. But then I just realized that they are just talented. Then came a performance by musical legend who has won every single award under the sun: Emmy. Grammy. Tony. Oscar perfect attendance - okay maybe not the last one but he was quite a funny guy. I’ll admit. I had no idea who he was at first - but then I found out that he was responsible for so many movie and musical scores that I enjoy such as “A Chorus Line,” “The Swimmer” and “The Sting.” Okay. I haven’t seen “The Swimmer” and I barely remember “The Sting,” but I certainly remember these songs: Do you recognize the song? It’s the theme from “Ice Castles!” He even went on to play “The Way We Were” sans Barbara! I sat there misty eyed and held the hand of the stranger next to me. I am so glad I know the man behind all these great songs. He is one hell of a piano player. And now. I am a better person for knowing who he is - and knowing is half the battle. Sorry folks. Miss Jennifer Hudson did not sing that. She even playfully said. “No. I am not going to sing ‘And I am Telling You.’” I think she might be tired of that song. If she isn’t she is better than me. If I was pinned to that song. I would be really annoyed. But whatever - Hudson can sing the same song repetitively and I would still give her a standing ovation. Hudson looked ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS in a high-waisted chocolaty frock with light-as-air movement and gold decolletage that shimmered in the spotlight with her charm. Even though she only sang a couple of songs. I was still satisfied. She even did a cover of Aretha Franklin’s “Mockingbird.” Once she started singing it that annoying scene from “Dumb and Dumber” immediately dissolved from my head. Before she sang it she said. “Hopefully I will get to play her in a movie in the future,” she said with a giggle. “Pray for me y’all!” I think she would be able to do it. J. Hud can do anything. She can even be Carrie’s assistant in the new Sex and the City movie. Okay okay. I’ll stop rambling. I know you want to get a little taste of what I saw… so hear ya go: XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.ibabuzz.com/fashion/2008/01/15/a-night-for-healthy-children/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Last night I went to the Gala Show for the event in San Francisco - and it was absolutely fabulous! First off the venue was gorgeous. It was my first time in the. Not because I am not cultured but because I had no reason to go there. I must say that it is quite a stunning building. I would suggest that every Bay Area citizen go to this place at least once: The event honored Alice Waters and the for their work in creating for the Berkeley public schools. It will also give funding to three Bay Area hospitals to fight childhood obesity. It’s a really good cause - and I could relate but that’s a story I’ll save for later. The evening also featured a performance by the North Carolina-based jump roping wunderkinds of The Bouncing Bulldogs: I got tired by just watching them. These kids had energy that was off the charts! At one point I wondered if they were uber-agile humanoids pumped full of Red Bull. But then I just realized that they are just talented. Then came a performance by musical legend who has won every single award under the sun: Emmy. Grammy. Tony. Oscar perfect attendance - okay maybe not the last one but he was quite a funny guy. I’ll admit. I had no idea who he was at first - but then I found out that he was responsible for so many movie and musical scores that I enjoy such as “A Chorus Line,” “The Swimmer” and “The Sting.” Okay. I haven’t seen “The Swimmer” and I barely remember “The Sting,” but I certainly remember these songs: Do you recognize the song? It’s the theme from “Ice Castles!” He even went on to play “The Way We Were” sans Barbara! I sat there misty eyed and held the hand of the stranger next to me. I am so glad I know the man behind all these great songs. He is one hell of a piano player. And now. I am a better person for knowing who he is - and knowing is half the battle. Sorry folks. Miss Jennifer Hudson did not sing that. She even playfully said. “No. I am not going to sing ‘And I am Telling You.’” I think she might be tired of that song. If she isn’t she is better than me. If I was pinned to that song. I would be really annoyed. But whatever - Hudson can sing the same song repetitively and I would still give her a standing ovation. Hudson looked ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS in a high-waisted chocolaty frock with light-as-air movement and gold decolletage that shimmered in the spotlight with her charm. Even though she only sang a couple of songs. I was still satisfied. She even did a cover of Aretha Franklin’s “Mockingbird.” Once she started singing it that annoying scene from “Dumb and Dumber” immediately dissolved from my head. Before she sang it she said. “Hopefully I will get to play her in a movie in the future,” she said with a giggle. “Pray for me y’all!” I think she would be able to do it. J. Hud can do anything. She can even be Carrie’s assistant in the new Sex and the City movie. Okay okay. I’ll stop rambling. I know you want to get a little taste of what I saw… so hear ya go: XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.ibabuzz.com/fashion/2008/01/15/a-night-for-healthy-children/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Last night I went to the Gala Show for the event in San Francisco - and it was absolutely fabulous! First off the venue was gorgeous. It was my first time in the. Not because I am not cultured but because I had no reason to go there. I must say that it is quite a stunning building. I would suggest that every Bay Area citizen go to this place at least once: The event honored Alice Waters and the for their work in creating for the Berkeley public schools. It will also give funding to three Bay Area hospitals to fight childhood obesity. It’s a really good cause - and I could relate but that’s a story I’ll save for later. The evening also featured a performance by the North Carolina-based jump roping wunderkinds of The Bouncing Bulldogs: I got tired by just watching them. These kids had energy that was off the charts! At one point I wondered if they were uber-agile humanoids pumped full of Red Bull. But then I just realized that they are just talented. Then came a performance by musical legend who has won every single award under the sun: Emmy. Grammy. Tony. Oscar perfect attendance - okay maybe not the last one but he was quite a funny guy. I’ll admit. I had no idea who he was at first - but then I found out that he was responsible for so many movie and musical scores that I enjoy such as “A Chorus Line,” “The Swimmer” and “The Sting.” Okay. I haven’t seen “The Swimmer” and I barely remember “The Sting,” but I certainly remember these songs: Do you recognize the song? It’s the theme from “Ice Castles!” He even went on to play “The Way We Were” sans Barbara! I sat there misty eyed and held the hand of the stranger next to me. I am so glad I know the man behind all these great songs. He is one hell of a piano player. And now. I am a better person for knowing who he is - and knowing is half the battle. Sorry folks. Miss Jennifer Hudson did not sing that. She even playfully said. “No. I am not going to sing ‘And I am Telling You.’” I think she might be tired of that song. If she isn’t she is better than me. If I was pinned to that song. I would be really annoyed. But whatever - Hudson can sing the same song repetitively and I would still give her a standing ovation. Hudson looked ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS in a high-waisted chocolaty frock with light-as-air movement and gold decolletage that shimmered in the spotlight with her charm. Even though she only sang a couple of songs. I was still satisfied. She even did a cover of Aretha Franklin’s “Mockingbird.” Once she started singing it that annoying scene from “Dumb and Dumber” immediately dissolved from my head. Before she sang it she said. “Hopefully I will get to play her in a movie in the future,” she said with a giggle. “Pray for me y’all!” I think she would be able to do it. J. Hud can do anything. She can even be Carrie’s assistant in the new Sex and the City movie. Okay okay. I’ll stop rambling. I know you want to get a little taste of what I saw… so hear ya go: XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.ibabuzz.com/fashion/2008/01/15/a-night-for-healthy-children/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

April 22: PA primaryMay 6: IN and NC primariesMay 13: WV primaryMay 20: KY and OR primaryMay 27: ID (R) primaryJune 1: PR primaryJune 3: MT. NM (R) and SD primariesAugust 25-28: Democratic National Convention - Denver. COSeptember 1-4: Republican National Convention - St. Paul. MN On the morning of June 6. 1984. Walter Mondale's campaign aides woke the Democratic presidential candidate to inform him of a big problem. California and New Jersey had held primaries the day before. The former vice president had confidently scheduled a press conference to announce that he had finally amassed enough delegates to claim the nomination over Colorado Sen. Gary Hart. There was just one glitch: Mondale was about 40 delegates short. Hart had won California; even worse. Mondale had not done come up enough there to pick up as many delegates as the race had counted on. So frantic Mondale aides hit the phones to the superdelegates. These were the Democratic insiders who had been given a big new express in the affect a change to party rules engineered by Mondale backers anticipating the be for just such a firewall. Mondale managed to pull it off that day. Though the story may sound like ancient history it remains relevant -- more relevant than it's been in years -- as a reminder of the importance of the arcane rules for choosing and allocating delegates. Indeed. 2008 is looking like 1984 on steroids: For the poorly organized underfinanced insurgent (Hart) substitute a candidate (Barack Obama) with the money and organization to compete with the establishment candidate (Hillary Clinton). For a front-runner about whom the party faithful are hardly enthusiastic (Mondale) substitute a candidate (Clinton) who has a loyal energized following. In addition the biggest factor pointing to an extended delegate-by-delegate slog is one that didn't exist in 1984: the relentless arithmetic of the celebrate's proportional representation rules in which candidates acquire delegates according to their share of the vote in each congressional district and for a smaller number statewide. Although that furnish was adopted in 1988 it has never change state relevant because a clear front-runner has emerged in every oppose since. However in a close race the rules make it difficult for a single candidate to arrange up a big enough margin to increase the necessary be of delegates. Given the contours of this oppose that may come up not come about in the supposed tsunami of voting on Feb. 5 at which point Democrats ordain have picked 1,818 delegates. 45 percent of the be. It's only difficult in a 3 or more person race. In a 2 person race it's hard to contradict one of the candidates a majority. If the race continues beyond Feb. 5 as the Mondale precedent suggests it might superdelegates could go into compete. These bigwigs -- governors members of Congress. Democratic National Committee members -- account for 796 or nearly 20 percent of the Democratic delegates. They are finger-in-the-wind fickle. But they could be decisive in a close contest a calculate that would be to help Clinton who has already amassed a superdelegate lead. Then there are the graduate seminar-level questions that could arise if the contest becomes really close or even heads into the convention unsettled. One is the Edwards Factor. Former North Carolina senator John Edwards's path to the nomination seems blocked but that does not necessarily render him irrelevant. Edwards can act collecting delegates so long as he receives 15 percent of the choose in a congressional district or statewide. If so he could have sway over a potentially decisive overlap of delegates whom he could urge to approve a particular candidate and his inclination in Obama's direction seems clear. Edwards's delegates would not be obligated to go his direction but his believe would be influential. Similarly and this one is for real rules junkies there could be a convention fight over seating the Michigan and Florida delegations. Those states have supposedly been stripped of their delegates as punishment for accelerating their primaries to before Feb. 5 but it's not entirely fanciful to imagine that a contend to their credentials could determine the outcome. "Real rules junkies"? A convention fight over the and delegations? Brokered convention madness is breaking out all over. I found it interesting yesterday that Bill Clinton angrily professed that this is a "one man one choose country".. especially since his vote as a superdelegate is worth more than 20,000 times that of the add up American. All of the candidates should pledge to only accept the celebrate's nomination if they win the popular choose. It was wrong when Al Gore lost the general election in 2000.. but it would be worse of our own celebrate made the same mistake. Andy WoernerKailua-Kona. HI This site is not affiliated with the DNC. DNCC or any campaign. Email us at dem con check -at- google groups dot com

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-madness-1984-version.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

April 22: PA primaryMay 6: IN and NC primariesMay 13: WV primaryMay 20: KY and OR primaryMay 27: ID (R) primaryJune 1: PR primaryJune 3: MT. NM (R) and SD primariesAugust 25-28: Democratic National Convention - Denver. COSeptember 1-4: Republican National Convention - St. Paul. MN On the morning of June 6. 1984. Walter Mondale's campaign aides woke the Democratic presidential candidate to communicate him of a big problem. California and New Jersey had held primaries the day before. The former vice president had confidently scheduled a touch conference to inform that he had finally amassed enough delegates to affirm the nomination over Colorado Sen. Gary Hart. There was just one glitch: Mondale was about 40 delegates bunco. Hart had won California; change surface worse. Mondale had not done well enough there to pick up as many delegates as the campaign had counted on. So frantic Mondale aides hit the phones to the superdelegates. These were the Democratic insiders who had been given a big new voice in the affect a change to celebrate rules engineered by Mondale backers anticipating the need for just such a firewall. Mondale managed to displace it off that day. Though the story may appear like ancient history it remains relevant -- more relevant than it's been in years -- as a reminder of the importance of the arcane rules for choosing and allocating delegates. Indeed. 2008 is looking like 1984 on steroids: For the poorly organized underfinanced insurgent (Hart) substitute a candidate (Barack Obama) with the money and organization to compete with the establishment candidate (Hillary Clinton). For a front-runner about whom the party faithful are hardly enthusiastic (Mondale) substitute a candidate (Clinton) who has a loyal energized following. In addition the biggest factor pointing to an extended delegate-by-delegate slog is one that didn't exist in 1984: the relentless arithmetic of the party's proportional representation rules in which candidates acquire delegates according to their share of the vote in each congressional district and for a smaller number statewide. Although that provision was adopted in 1988 it has never become relevant because a alter front-runner has emerged in every oppose since. However in a change state race the rules make it difficult for a single candidate to arrange up a big enough margin to amass the necessary be of delegates. Given the contours of this oppose that may well not come about in the supposed tsunami of voting on Feb. 5 at which point Democrats will undergo picked 1,818 delegates. 45 percent of the total. It's only difficult in a 3 or more person race. In a 2 person race it's hard to deny one of the candidates a majority. If the race continues beyond Feb. 5 as the Mondale precedent suggests it might superdelegates could go into play. These bigwigs -- governors members of Congress. Democratic National Committee members -- account for 796 or nearly 20 percent of the Democratic delegates. They are finger-in-the-wind fickle. But they could be decisive in a close contest a factor that would be to back up Clinton who has already amassed a superdelegate lead. Then there are the graduate seminar-level questions that could arise if the oppose becomes really close or change surface heads into the convention unsettled. One is the Edwards Factor. Former North Carolina senator John Edwards's path to the nomination seems blocked but that does not necessarily get him irrelevant. Edwards can keep collecting delegates so desire as he receives 15 percent of the vote in a congressional govern or statewide. If so he could have sway over a potentially decisive share of delegates whom he could urge to approve a particular candidate and his inclination in Obama's direction seems clear. Edwards's delegates would not be obligated to follow his direction but his view would be influential. Similarly and this one is for real rules junkies there could be a convention contend over seating the Michigan and Florida delegations. Those states have supposedly been stripped of their delegates as punishment for accelerating their primaries to before Feb. 5 but it's not entirely fanciful to imagine that a challenge to their credentials could cause the outcome. "Real rules junkies"? A convention fight over the and delegations? Brokered convention madness is breaking out all over. I found it interesting yesterday that account Clinton angrily professed that this is a "one man one vote country".. especially since his vote as a superdelegate is worth more than 20,000 times that of the average American. All of the candidates should assure to only accept the celebrate's nomination if they win the popular vote. It was wrong when Al Gore lost the general election in 2000.. but it would be worse of our own party made the same mistake. Andy WoernerKailua-Kona. HI This site is not affiliated with the DNC. DNCC or any campaign. telecommunicate us at dem con watch -at- explore groups dot com

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-madness-1984-version.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

April 22: PA primaryMay 6: IN and NC primariesMay 13: WV primaryMay 20: KY and OR primaryMay 27: ID (R) primaryJune 1: PR primaryJune 3: MT. NM (R) and SD primariesAugust 25-28: Democratic National Convention - Denver. COSeptember 1-4: Republican National Convention - St. Paul. MN On the morning of June 6. 1984. Walter Mondale's race aides woke the Democratic presidential candidate to communicate him of a big problem. California and New Jersey had held primaries the day before. The former vice president had confidently scheduled a press conference to inform that he had finally amassed enough delegates to claim the nomination over Colorado Sen. Gary Hart. There was just one glitch: Mondale was about 40 delegates short. Hart had won California; change surface worse. Mondale had not done well enough there to pick up as many delegates as the race had counted on. So frantic Mondale aides hit the phones to the superdelegates. These were the Democratic insiders who had been given a big new express in the affect a change to party rules engineered by Mondale backers anticipating the need for just such a firewall. Mondale managed to pull it off that day. Though the story may sound like ancient history it remains relevant -- more relevant than it's been in years -- as a reminder of the importance of the arcane rules for choosing and allocating delegates. Indeed. 2008 is looking like 1984 on steroids: For the poorly organized underfinanced insurgent (Hart) alter a candidate (Barack Obama) with the money and organization to compete with the establishment candidate (Hillary Clinton). For a front-runner about whom the celebrate faithful are hardly enthusiastic (Mondale) alter a candidate (Clinton) who has a loyal energized following. In addition the biggest calculate pointing to an extended delegate-by-delegate slog is one that didn't exist in 1984: the relentless arithmetic of the party's proportional representation rules in which candidates receive delegates according to their overlap of the vote in each congressional district and for a smaller number statewide. Although that provision was adopted in 1988 it has never become relevant because a alter front-runner has emerged in every contest since. However in a close race the rules make it difficult for a single candidate to arrange up a big enough margin to increase the necessary be of delegates. Given the contours of this oppose that may come up not come about in the supposed tsunami of voting on Feb. 5 at which inform Democrats will have picked 1,818 delegates. 45 percent of the total. It's only difficult in a 3 or more person go. In a 2 person race it's hard to deny one of the candidates a majority. If the go continues beyond Feb. 5 as the Mondale precedent suggests it might superdelegates could go into play. These bigwigs -- governors members of Congress. Democratic National Committee members -- account for 796 or nearly 20 percent of the Democratic delegates. They are finger-in-the-wind fickle. But they could be decisive in a close contest a calculate that would tend to help Clinton who has already amassed a superdelegate lead. Then there are the graduate seminar-level questions that could become if the oppose becomes really change state or even heads into the convention unsettled. One is the Edwards calculate. Former North Carolina senator John Edwards's path to the nomination seems blocked but that does not necessarily render him irrelevant. Edwards can keep collecting delegates so long as he receives 15 percent of the vote in a congressional district or statewide. If so he could have sway over a potentially decisive share of delegates whom he could urge to approve a particular candidate and his inclination in Obama's direction seems clear. Edwards's delegates would not be obligated to follow his direction but his believe would be influential. Similarly and this one is for real rules junkies there could be a convention fight over seating the Michigan and Florida delegations. Those states undergo supposedly been stripped of their delegates as punishment for accelerating their primaries to before Feb. 5 but it's not entirely fanciful to imagine that a challenge to their credentials could determine the outcome. "Real rules junkies"? A convention contend over the and delegations? Brokered convention madness is breaking out all over. I found it interesting yesterday that Bill Clinton angrily professed that this is a "one man one vote country".. especially since his vote as a superdelegate is worth more than 20,000 times that of the add up American. All of the candidates should assure to only accept the party's nomination if they win the popular choose. It was do by when Al Gore lost the general election in 2000.. but it would be worse of our own party made the same mistake. Andy WoernerKailua-Kona. HI This place is not affiliated with the DNC. DNCC or any campaign. telecommunicate us at dem con watch -at- google groups dot com

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-madness-1984-version.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

April 22: PA primaryMay 6: IN and NC primariesMay 13: WV primaryMay 20: KY and OR primaryMay 27: ID (R) primaryJune 1: PR primaryJune 3: MT. NM (R) and SD primariesAugust 25-28: Democratic National Convention - Denver. COSeptember 1-4: Republican National Convention - St. Paul. MN On the morning of June 6. 1984. Walter Mondale's race aides woke the Democratic presidential candidate to inform him of a big problem. California and New Jersey had held primaries the day before. The former vice president had confidently scheduled a press conference to inform that he had finally amassed enough delegates to claim the nomination over Colorado Sen. Gary Hart. There was just one glitch: Mondale was about 40 delegates short. Hart had won California; even worse. Mondale had not done well enough there to pick up as many delegates as the campaign had counted on. So frantic Mondale aides hit the phones to the superdelegates. These were the Democratic insiders who had been given a big new voice in the affect a change to party rules engineered by Mondale backers anticipating the be for just such a firewall. Mondale managed to pull it off that day. Though the story may sound like ancient history it remains relevant -- more relevant than it's been in years -- as a reminder of the importance of the arcane rules for choosing and allocating delegates. Indeed. 2008 is looking like 1984 on steroids: For the poorly organized underfinanced insurgent (Hart) substitute a candidate (Barack Obama) with the money and organization to compete with the establishment candidate (Hillary Clinton). For a front-runner about whom the celebrate faithful are hardly enthusiastic (Mondale) substitute a candidate (Clinton) who has a loyal energized following. In addition the biggest factor pointing to an extended delegate-by-delegate slog is one that didn't exist in 1984: the relentless arithmetic of the party's proportional representation rules in which candidates acquire delegates according to their share of the vote in each congressional district and for a smaller number statewide. Although that provision was adopted in 1988 it has never become relevant because a alter front-runner has emerged in every oppose since. However in a close race the rules make it difficult for a single candidate to arrange up a big enough margin to amass the necessary be of delegates. Given the contours of this contest that may well not happen in the supposed tsunami of voting on Feb. 5 at which inform Democrats will have picked 1,818 delegates. 45 percent of the be. It's only difficult in a 3 or more person race. In a 2 person race it's hard to contradict one of the candidates a majority. If the race continues beyond Feb. 5 as the Mondale precedent suggests it might superdelegates could come into compete. These bigwigs -- governors members of Congress. Democratic National Committee members -- account for 796 or nearly 20 percent of the Democratic delegates. They are finger-in-the-wind fickle. But they could be decisive in a close contest a calculate that would tend to back up Clinton who has already amassed a superdelegate lead. Then there are the have seminar-level questions that could become if the oppose becomes really close or change surface heads into the convention unsettled. One is the Edwards Factor. Former North Carolina senator John Edwards's path to the nomination seems blocked but that does not necessarily render him irrelevant. Edwards can act collecting delegates so long as he receives 15 percent of the choose in a congressional district or statewide. If so he could undergo move back and forth over a potentially decisive share of delegates whom he could advise to back a particular candidate and his inclination in Obama's direction seems alter. Edwards's delegates would not be obligated to follow his direction but his believe would be influential. Similarly and this one is for real rules junkies there could be a convention fight over seating the Michigan and Florida delegations. Those states undergo supposedly been stripped of their delegates as punishment for accelerating their primaries to before Feb. 5 but it's not entirely fanciful to create by mental act that a challenge to their credentials could determine the outcome. "Real rules junkies"? A convention fight over the and delegations? Brokered convention madness is breaking out all over. I found it interesting yesterday that Bill Clinton angrily professed that this is a "one man one vote country".. especially since his vote as a superdelegate is worth more than 20,000 times that of the average American. All of the candidates should pledge to only accept the party's nomination if they win the popular vote. It was wrong when Al pierce lost the general election in 2000.. but it would be worse of our own party made the same mistake. Andy WoernerKailua-Kona. HI This site is not affiliated with the DNC. DNCC or any campaign. Email us at dem con check -at- google groups dot com

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-madness-1984-version.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam